it shows option for 64k and 128k
what do u say…?
links:
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/microcontr … pment/225/
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthre … st29151853
Looks like you just need to push the 128 ignoring the datasheet and it should work.
Thanks for sharing it! if you find any other chip in the series has more memory than advertised please post it too.
So this is probably a mistake by STM, they forgot to disable that part of the Flash. Will they let that go, or at some point realise their mistake and disable it? It is great for hobby users, but would seem like a bad idea for commercial users to rely on.
No one can successfully claim a refund if their 64kB part only has 64kB! The worst case will mean buying the 128kB part instead.
It would be nice if the 128kB part actually has 256kB ![]()
So this is probably a mistake by STM, they forgot to disable that part of the Flash. Will they let that go, or at some point realise their mistake and disable it? It is great for hobby users, but would seem like a bad idea for commercial users to rely on.
No one can successfully claim a refund if their 64kB part only has 64kB! The worst case will mean buying the 128kB part instead.
It would be nice if the 128kB part actually has 256kB ![]()
Just choose the Generic STM32F103Cb (128k) if you like.
I’m not sure how you can easily test this, you’d need to have a rather large program to upload
I can write things out of the 40000 limit, read it back, compare, and is not duplicating pages or anything like that. Looks like this is a crippled RET chip…
Just choose the Generic STM32F103Cb (128k) if you like.
I’m not sure how you can easily test this, you’d need to have a rather large program to upload
Some Bootloaders, OS and RTOS are flash hungry.
Chancing a config file somewhere?
If it’s that simple…nice
Thanks, I’ll try it.
What Arduino world are you living in?
<…>
But hey, good news
<…>
But hey, good news

